AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |
Back to Blog
Fallout 4 editing automatrons1/1/2023 ![]() What they did - To test how behavior variability affected the perceived “humanness” of the robots, Wykowska devised an experiment similar to Simon Says in which human and robot pairs worked together to press buttons in a shapes- and color-matching game. This could be especially important in collaborative work environments, like warehouses or operating rooms. Why it matters - This version of the Turing test says less about the capabilities of the robots themselves, though learning more about how humans’ perceptions of robots can change is crucial to developing better methods for human-machine interaction, Wykowska says. ![]() Wykowska oversees the robot that will eventually oversee humanity’s end. “This variation is important because it moves from the idea that humanness is associated with language to the focus on subtle human-like behavior of the robot.” “In our study, we avoid talking about intelligence it is complicated to determine what makes a human intelligent is even less clear what machine intelligence would be,” she says. However, the team decided to deviate from this definition for a number of reasons, says Wykowska. If the machine is able to fool the participants into believing it’s human, then it has passed the test and, in turn, theoretically possesses some level of human intelligence. Through these conversations, the main human participant must decide whether they’re chatting with another person or a machine. Here’s the background - Famously proposed by computer scientist Alan Turing in the 1950s, the classic Turing test - also called the Imitation Game - works by having human participants interact blindly with either another human or a robot via text conversation. “We created a situation in which users were not able to distinguish whether they were interacting with a robot controlled by a human or by a computer program,” lead author Agnieszka Wykowska, a professor of human-robot interaction at the Italian Institute of Technology, tells Inverse. To put it simply, the robots were able to perform a task alongside a human partner in a matter so convincingly human that their partners couldn’t tell whether they were actually human or not. In the findings, published Wednesday in the journal Science Robotics, researchers report that their robot test subjects have passed the new, nonverbal Turing test. In a new paper, a team of researchers has implemented a variation of this test that looks at behavior variability found in humans and animals to see whether or not mimicking this trait can make robots seem more alive.īy introducing variability in reaction time to robots’ otherwise rigidly programmed behavior, the team of researchers found that humans can be fooled into believing a robot is flesh and blood. That’s the premise of the Turing test, which helps determine whether or not a robot or A.I. ![]() Yet, when people cannot see the robots they interact with, this distinction between what is and isn’t human becomes much hazier. ![]() Fallout 4 editing automatrons skin#If you ran into a robot in the street, there are a number of crucial giveaways that would help you pick it out from a human crowd - silicon skin or unblinking eyes, to name a few. ![]()
0 Comments
Read More
Leave a Reply. |